Nine seat review panel

A review that tells you the truth about your proposal.

You cannot review your own proposal. One score hides the signal that matters most. VerdictTank runs your document through a nine seat panel and returns two scores, one verdict, and ten dimensions of evidence.

Nine independent reviewers Full audit trail No self-review Two scores, one verdict
verdicttank.com / review
Sample verdict · Field Service Dispatch Platform
Reconciler waiting for panel...
Proposal Strength
0/100
How well the document makes its case.
Investor Readiness
0/100
How well the business survives scrutiny.
● PROMISING: Real potential, material gaps remain.
The problem

Every founder is the worst judge of their own proposal.

You cannot review your own proposal.
One score hides the signal that matters most.

01

Single reviewer, single blind spot

One reader, however sharp, brings one set of assumptions. Whatever they miss, you miss too, and you never find out until it is too late.

02

One score tells you nothing actionable

A single overall number cannot tell you whether the problem is the pitch, the financials, or the legal exposure. It just tells you to feel bad.

03

You wrote it, so you cannot see it

Founders and teams are structurally too close to their own material to spot the gaps a fresh, disinterested reader will catch immediately.

How it works

Nine reviewers score independently. One reconciles them.

R
Research
P
Primary Read
M
Market
F
Financial
L
Legal
E
Execution
T
Team
RE
Risk & Ethics
G
Grounding
Each seat reviews the proposal in isolation, with no visibility into the others. The reconciler then synthesizes all nine into two composite scores and one verdict.
Why not just ask one model

A single model gives you a single opinion wearing a number.

Axis Ask one model yourself A single overall score VerdictTank
Independence One perspective, one set of blind spots Cannot tell you where the score came from Nine seats score independently before reconciliation
What you learn A paragraph you have to interpret yourself A single number and nothing else Two composite scores plus ten dimension breakdowns
Where the risk hides Wherever that one model happened to look Averaged away, invisible Surfaced by dimension, not buried in an average
Repeatability Different answer every time you ask No audit trail to check Full audit trail across every seat and the reconciler
Sample verdict

Here is exactly what you get back.

The panel above rendered a live sample verdict for a fictional proposal. Every real submission returns this same structure: two scores, one verdict, ten dimensions.

Proposal Strength breakdown

Problem Clarity
8/10
Market Reality
7/10
Differentiation
6/10
Business Model
8/10
Evidence Quality
7/10

Investor Readiness breakdown

Financial Credibility
6/10
Execution Feasibility
7/10
Team Capability
6/10
Legal and Regulatory Posture
5/10
Competitive Defensibility
5/10
The point

It tells you what is missing, not just a number.

A 74 and a 61 do not tell a founder anything by themselves. Legal and Regulatory Posture at 5 and Competitive Defensibility at 5 tell them exactly where to spend the next two weeks before they resubmit.

That is the difference between a score and a verdict: a verdict points somewhere.

The loop

This isn't a scoring endpoint. It's a loop.

1

Submit a draft

Upload your proposal in its current state, gaps and all.

2

Panel scores

Nine seats review independently, no cross-talk between them.

3

Verdict returns

Two scores, a verdict band, and ten dimensions of detail.

4

Revise and resubmit

Fix the flagged dimensions and run it again before it counts.

Pricing

Five price points. No hidden panel.

Free

$0
  • Reduced panel review
  • Two composite scores
  • Verdict band
Start free

One Shot

$29
  • Full nine seat panel
  • All ten dimensions
  • One submission
Buy one review

Enterprise

$699/mo
  • Team seats
  • Priority processing
  • Portfolio-wide view
Talk to us

White Label

$3,000/mo
  • Your brand, our panel
  • Client-facing reports
  • Dedicated onboarding
Contact sales

Five price points. No hidden panel.

Data handling

Your documents are processed by 9 independent review providers. 8 of the 9 do not train on your content. See the data-handling disclosure for the one exception and our retention policy.

Get the verdict before your investor does.

Two scores. One verdict. Ten dimensions. No self-review.