Nine seats. One reconciler.

A review that tells you the truth about your proposal.

You cannot review your own proposal. One score hides the signal that matters most. VerdictTank runs it through a nine-seat panel and returns a verdict.

pronounced ver-dict-tank

Sample verdict
Sample: Field Service Dispatch Platform
Awaiting panel...
Proposal Strength
0
How well the document makes its case.
Investor Readiness
0
How well the business survives scrutiny.
SCORING The panel is reading the submission.

Proposal Strength

Problem Clarity
8/10
Market Reality
7/10
Differentiation
6/10
Business Model
8/10
Evidence Quality
7/10

Investor Readiness

Financial Credibility
6/10
Execution Feasibility
7/10
Team Capability
6/10
Legal and Regulatory Posture
5/10
Competitive Defensibility
5/10
Nine seats Two scores No self-review Full audit trail White-label
The problem

Why you cannot see your own proposal clearly

You wrote it. You already believe it. That is exactly why you cannot grade it.

You cannot review your own proposal

Authors read intent, not the words on the page. Every gap gets silently filled in by memory.

One score hides the signal that matters

A single number tells you nothing about whether the document argues well or the business holds up.

Feedback arrives too late

By the time a reviewer, partner, or investor flags the weak spot, the meeting is already over.

The mechanism

Nine reviewers score independently. One reconciles them.

Nine seats read the same document without seeing each other's notes. A reconciler resolves disagreement into one verdict: Proposal Strength, Investor Readiness, ten dimensions, and a band.

The loop

This is not a scoring endpoint. It is a loop.

Submit a draft. The panel scores it. You get a verdict. You revise. You resubmit.

One verdict, on the house. See exactly what the panel returns before you commit.

Sample verdict
Sample: Field Service Dispatch Platform
PROMISING
Proposal Strength
74
How well the document makes its case.
Investor Readiness
61
How well the business survives scrutiny.

Proposal Strength

Problem Clarity
8/10
Market Reality
7/10
Differentiation
6/10
Business Model
8/10
Evidence Quality
7/10

Investor Readiness

Financial Credibility
6/10
Execution Feasibility
7/10
Team Capability
6/10
Legal and Regulatory Posture
5/10
Competitive Defensibility
5/10
Old way vs VerdictTank

Replace hope with a panel

Before

Ask a friend or send it out cold

  • One opinion, one blind spot, no structure.
  • Feedback arrives after the meeting, not before it.
  • No way to compare draft two against draft one.
  • Nobody scores the business model against the pitch itself.
With VerdictTank

Nine seats, one reconciled verdict

  • Independent scoring across ten dimensions, no groupthink.
  • A verdict band you can act on before you send the deck.
  • Resubmit as many times as the loop requires.
  • A full audit trail of what changed between drafts.
Sample verdicts

What comes back to you

Illustrative outputs showing the verdict format. Not accuracy claims.

Sample verdict

Field Service Dispatch Platform

Verdict: PROMISING

74
Strength
61
Readiness
Sample verdict

Clinic Scheduling Add-on

Verdict: CONDITIONAL

58
Strength
52
Readiness
Sample verdict

Municipal Fleet Analytics

Verdict: STRONG

86
Strength
81
Readiness
Pricing

Five price points. No hidden panel.

Every tier runs the same nine-seat panel and the same reconciler. What changes is volume, seats, and branding.

Free $0

One verdict, full detail, no card required.

Start free
One Shot $29

A single deep verdict for one proposal, once.

Buy one shot
Enterprise $699/mo

Multiple teams, shared panels, exportable audit trails.

Talk to us
White Label $3,000/mo

Run VerdictTank under your own brand for your own clients.

Talk to us
Roadmap

Where the panel is headed

v1.0

Nine-seat panel and reconciler

The core loop: submit, score, verdict, revise, resubmit. Live today.

v1.1

Draft-over-draft comparison

See exactly which dimensions moved between your last two submissions.

v1.2

Shared team panels

Invite collaborators into the same verdict thread with shared history.

Your documents are processed by 9 independent review providers. 8 of the 9 do not train on your content. See the data-handling disclosure for the one exception and our retention policy.

Get the verdict before anyone else has to give it to you.

Nine reviewers score independently. One reconciles them. You get the truth about your proposal today.